D.5.1 Outline the value of classifying organisms
Classification systems for living organisms are of value because they:
- Allow us to distinguish between and compare organisms based on characteristics
- Makes it easier to identify organisms according to a globally recognised scheme
- Makes it easier to collect, sort and store information about organisms
- Shows how closely organisms are related and suggests evolutionary links
- Allows predictions to be made (about characteristics of members of a group)
D.5.2 Explain the biochemical evidence provided by the universality of DNA and protein structures for the common ancestry of living organisms
- All organisms use DNA and RNA as their genetic material
- Four bases (adenine, guanine, thymine, cytosine) form the basis of this code and undergo the same complementary pairing (A = T ; G = C)
- Conserved genes have similar functions
- Common mechanisms for DNA replication and protein synthesis are used by all organisms (including similar enzymes for these processes)
- The genetic code is (almost) universal – the same codons code for the same amino acids
- All living organisms use the same 20 amino acids for protein synthesis
- These amino acids are all L-isomers and not D-isomers
- Large groups of organisms share certain proteins and metabolic pathways (e.g. haemoglobin, cytochrome c)
- The degree of difference between organisms in DNA / protein sequence demonstrates the level of relationship between organisms
- The more similar the base / amino acid sequences are, the more closely related two species are likely to be
Comparing DNA Sequences using DNA-DNA Hybridisation
![DNA hybridisation](../../_Media/dna-hybridisation_med.jpeg)
D.5.3 Explain how variation in specific molecules can indicate phylogeny
- Phylogeny refers to an evolutionary line of descent and can be determined by comparing similar molecules in different species (e.g. haemoglobin)
- Variations in these molecules (either base or amino acid sequence) will occur due to mutations
- The greater the differences between the common molecules, the longer the time span since the two species had a common ancestor
- Mitochondrial DNA is useful for tracing phylogeny as it is inherited via the maternal line, lacks recombination and has a known mutation rate
A Comparison of DNA Sequences from Different Species (Multiple Alignment)
![multiple alignment](../../_Media/multiple-alignment_med.jpeg)
D.5.4 Discuss how biochemical variation can be used as an evolutionary clock
- Some genes or protein sequences may accumulate mutations at a relatively constant rate (e.g. a 1% change per million years)
- If this rate of change is reliable, scientists can calculate the time of divergence based on the number of differences between two species
- This concept is called the evolutionary clock (or 'molecular clock'), and is limited by a number of factors:
- The rate of change can differ for different groups of organisms (e.g. animals and plants)
- The rate of change can vary between different genes and different proteins
- Over long periods, earlier changes may be reversed by later changes
D.5.5 Define clade and cladistics
Clade: A group of organisms consisting of a single common ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor
Cladistics: A method of classification of living organisms based on the construction and analysis of cladograms
D.5.6 Distinguish, with examples, between analogous and homologous characteristics
![Screen Shot 2013-01-30 at 8.50.54 PM](../../_Media/screen-shot-2013-01-30-at_med.png)
Analogous versus Homologous Structures
![Analogous vs Homologous](../../_Media/analogous-vs-homologous_med.jpeg)
D.5.7 Outline the methods used to construct cladograms and the conclusions that can be drawn from them
Constructing Cladograms
- A cladogram is a tree-like diagram where nodes represent the splitting of two new groups from a common ancestor
- Members of a clade typically share a set of features not found in more distant relatives
- Cladistics are most commonly based on molecular differences (base or amino acid sequences)
- Cladograms are calculated by software that depicts the cladogram with the fewest number of brances
- For rooting the cladogram, an outgroup (most distantly related species) is used
Conclusions from Cladograms
- The more nodes between two groups the less closely related they are expected to be
- Cladograms are based on probability, but improbable events (e.g. certain mutations) can occur, so relationships may be wrong
D.5.8 Construct a simple cladogram
Step 1: Organise organisms according to defined characteristics
![Screen Shot 2013-01-30 at 9.42.10 PM](../../_Media/screen-shot-2013-01-30-at_med-3.png)
Step 2: Represent this information as a cladogram by ordering organisms by shared characteristics (nodes)
![phylogeny tree](../../_Media/phylogeny-tree_med.jpeg)
D.5.9 Analyse cladograms in terms of phylogenetic relationships
The more nodes between two groups, the less closely related they are expected to be
According to the cladogram above:
- The chimpanzee is most similar to the bear
- The lizard is equally similar to the bear and chimpanzee
D.5.10 Discuss the relationship between cladograms and the classification of living organisms
- Classification was traditionally based on morphology (structural characteristics)
- Methods used to construct cladograms typically utilise a different approach (e.g. molecular data - more objective)
- Cladograms can show ancestral relationships and reflect how recently two groups shared a common ancestry
- As such they should be considered a good complement to traditional classification schemes
- In some cases, cladograms have lead to revisions in scientific classifications