The comparative distribution of two species can be used as an indicator of the type of relationship between them
Interspecific competition is indicated (but not proven) if one species is more successful in the absence of another
In such circumstances, the two species do not tend to appear in the same environment (they have different realised niches)
Interspecific competition can be assessed via a number of different research methods:
Laboratory experiments can be conducted under controlled conditions by measuring a dependent variable when the species are both present or individually isolated
Field manipulation research may involve the selective removal of one species to determine the impact on the other within the natural environment
Field observations can also occur, where random sample sites are assessed (using quadrats) for the presence or absence of each species
If data has been collected via quadrat sampling, a chi-squared test can be performed to determine if there is a statistically significant association between the distribution of two species
If two species are typically found within the same habitat, they show a positive association (e.g. predator-prey dynamic)
If two species tend not to occur within the same habitat, they show a negative association (e.g. interspecific competition)
If two species do not interact, there will be no association between them and their distribution will be independent of one another
The presence or absence of two species of mollusc (limpet and whelk) was recorded in fifty quadrats (1m2) on a rocky sea shore
The following distribution pattern was observed:
6 quadrats = both species
15 quadrats = limpet only
20 quadrats = whelk only
9 quadrats = neither species
Step 1: Construct a contingency table of the results
The table shows the numbers present or absent for each species (row = one species, column = other species)
Row totals, column totals and overall totals must also be included in the table
Step 2: Construct a table of frequencies
Observed values are the values collected via quadrat sampling
Expected values = (row total × column total) ÷ overall total
This data is then processed to work out the chi-squared value
Step 3: Calculate a chi-squared value
χ2 = ∑(O – E)2 ÷ E
2.38 + 1.59 + 2.20 + 1.73 = 7.90
Step 4: Identify the p value
The p value indicates the probability that the results are due to chance (lower p value is more significant)
A p value of less than 5% chance (p<0.05) is considered to be statistically significant
The degree of freedom (df) designates what range of values fall within each significance level
For association tests between two species the degree of freedom should always be 1
If p<0.05 the alternative hypothesis is accepted, otherwise the null hypothesis is accepted
Alternative hypothesis: There is an association between the two species
Null hypothesis: There is no association between the two species (distribution is random)
Step 5: Determine statistical significance
The chi-squared value (7.90) is greater than the critical value for significance (3.84)
Hence the results are statistically significant (alternative hypothesis is accepted)